🔗 Share this article

An activist group has stated to have harvested a vast number of songs from Spotify and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Potential Boost for AI Training

Observers noted the seeming leak could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for material to develop their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of metadata such as performer and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not represent its full catalog.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access identified a external actor collected public metadata and employed questionable tactics to bypass DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Goal and Worries

Spotify does not think the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

AI Training and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would probably be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated material is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to be used training AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to LibGen, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by Meta to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that members of the public could in principle “create their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. He said it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between creatives, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

In the UK, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government proposal to allow AI companies use protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every participant to a government consultation on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

A government minister for science, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.